|
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters
|
Partners |
Urban |
2021 |
|
|
75.80 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
This data is based on an estimate from information available for urban cities |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Urban |
Partners |
2021-10-25 |
2021 |
75.80 |
|
|
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Partners |
Partners |
2021 |
|
|
75.80 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on few key experts |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Partners |
Partners |
2021-08-11 |
2021 |
75.80 |
|
|
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Modulus Tech (Developer) |
Karachi |
2021 |
|
|
75.80 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Karachi |
Modulus Tech (Developer) |
2021-07-16 |
2021 |
75.80 |
|
|
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
EPL (Developer) |
Lahore |
2021 |
|
|
75.80 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Lahore |
EPL (Developer) |
2021-07-05 |
2021 |
75.80 |
|
|
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
AMC (Developer) |
Peshawar |
2021 |
|
|
75.80 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Peshawar |
AMC (Developer) |
2021-10-11 |
2021 |
75.80 |
|
|
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Potohar Builders |
Islamabad |
2021 |
|
|
75.80 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Regulated minimum size of a residential plot in urban areas in square meters |
Islamabad |
Potohar Builders |
2021-10-11 |
2021 |
75.80 |
|
|
Smallest residential plot size
|
Partners |
Partners |
2021 |
|
|
37.9m2 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on few key experts |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Smallest residential plot size |
Partners |
Partners |
2021-08-11 |
2021 |
37.9m2 |
|
|
Smallest residential plot size |
Modulus Tech (Developer) |
Karachi |
2021 |
|
|
50.5m2 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Smallest residential plot size |
Karachi |
Modulus Tech (Developer) |
2021-07-16 |
2021 |
50.2m2 |
|
|
Smallest residential plot size |
EPL (Developer) |
Lahore |
2021 |
|
|
75.8m2 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Smallest residential plot size |
Lahore |
EPL (Developer) |
2021-07-05 |
2021 |
75.8m2 |
|
|
Smallest residential plot size |
AMC (Developer) |
Peshawar |
2021 |
|
|
37.9m2 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Smallest residential plot size |
Peshawar |
AMC (Developer) |
2021-10-11 |
2021 |
37.9m2 |
|
|
Smallest residential plot size |
Potohar Builders |
Islamabad |
2021 |
|
|
75.8m2 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Smallest residential plot size |
Islamabad |
Potohar Builders |
2021-10-11 |
2021 |
75.8m2 |
|
|
Average land costs per m2
|
Zameen.com |
Karachi |
2021 |
|
|
28,007 PKR$160.26 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value consists of outliers. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings based on opinions of sector participants but not confirmable. Data may be skewed as value consists of outliers |
Sample size is not fully representative and excludes key aggregations |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is outdated and lacks information on data collection methodology. Source verifiability remains a concern. |
Data is difficult to find and requires calculation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Average land costs per m2 |
Karachi |
Zameen.comLink to source |
2021-08-20 |
2021 |
27,878 PKR$159.52 |
|
|
Average land costs per m2 |
Zameen.com |
Lahore |
2021 |
|
|
66,779 PKR$382.12 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value consists of outliers. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings based on opinions of sector participants but not confirmable. Data may be skewed as value consists of outliers |
Sample size is not fully representative and excludes key aggregations |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is outdated and lacks information on data collection methodology. Source verifiability remains a concern. |
Data is difficult to find and requires calculation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Average land costs per m2 |
Lahore |
Zameen.comLink to source |
2021-09-23 |
2021 |
66,779 PKR$382.12 |
|
|
Average land costs per m2 |
Zameen.com |
Islamabad |
2021 |
|
|
61,247 PKR$350.46 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value consists of outliers. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings based on opinions of sector participants but not confirmable. Data may be skewed as value consists of outliers |
Sample size is not fully representative and excludes key aggregations |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is outdated and lacks information on data collection methodology. Source verifiability remains a concern. |
Data is difficult to find and requires calculation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Average land costs per m2 |
Islamabad |
Zameen.comLink to source |
2021-09-23 |
2021 |
61,247 PKR$350.46 |
|
|
% Of land for residential development acquired from the private sector
|
Partners |
Partners |
2021 |
|
|
100% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is fully representative for the required aggregate |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on one expert |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Size of land for residential development acquired from the private sector in m2 |
Partners |
Partners |
2021-10-11 |
2021 |
30,000 |
Total size of land acquired for residential development in m2 |
Partners |
Partners |
2021-10-12 |
2021 |
30,000 |
|
|
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Asia
|
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
National |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 32 with 15 other countries out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Asia |
National |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-10 |
2020 |
Tied 32nd with 15 other countries and cities out of 48 |
|
|
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Asia |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Karachi |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 32 with 15 other countries out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Asia |
Karachi |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 32nd with 15 other countries and cities out of 48 |
|
|
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Asia |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Lahore |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 32 with 15 other countries out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Asia |
Lahore |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 32nd with 15 other countries and cities out of 48 |
|
|
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Global
|
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
National |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 100 with 87 other countries out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Global |
National |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-04 |
2020 |
Tied 100th with 87 other countries and cities out of 190 |
|
|
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Global |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Karachi |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 100 with 87 other countries out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Global |
Karachi |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 100th with 87 other countries and cities out of 190 |
|
|
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Global |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Lahore |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 100 with 87 other countries out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI geographic coverage index score ranking: Global |
Lahore |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 100th with 87 other countries and cities out of 190 |
|
|
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Asia
|
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
National |
2020 |
|
|
37 out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Asia |
National |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Ranked 37th out of 48 countries and cities |
|
|
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Asia |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Karachi |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 42 with 1 other country out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Asia |
Karachi |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 42nd with 1 other country and city out of 48 |
|
|
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Asia |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Lahore |
2020 |
|
|
29 out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Asia |
Lahore |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Ranked 29th out of 48 countries and cities |
|
|
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Global
|
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
National |
2020 |
|
|
129 out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Global |
National |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-04 |
2020 |
Ranked 129th out of 190 countries and cities |
|
|
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Global |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Karachi |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 151 with 10 other countries out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Global |
Karachi |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 151st with 10 other countries and cities out of 190 |
|
|
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Global |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Lahore |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 91 with 1 other country out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI quality of land administration index ranking: Global |
Lahore |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 91st with 1 other country and city out of 190 |
|
|
Number of procedures to register residential property
|
Provincial Land Authorities' and Revenue Departments |
National |
2021 |
|
|
4 to 9 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data remains unavailable for Quetta City |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Indicator definition is only available for cities in Punjab. Data methodology is not indicated. |
Data value acquired through portal(s) which can be difficult to access |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of procedures to register residential property |
National |
Provincial Land Authorities' and Revenue Departments |
2021-08-17 |
2021 |
4 to 9 |
|
|
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Partners |
Partners |
2021 |
|
|
6 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative and excludes key aggregations |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on few key experts |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Partners |
Partners |
2021-09-01 |
2021 |
6 |
|
|
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Pakistan Doing Business |
Karachi |
2021 |
|
|
6 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Lack of information on methodology and underlying data sources |
Data not available in raw form and is available through an online portal |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Karachi |
Pakistan Doing BusinessLink to source |
2021-08-11 |
2021 |
6 |
|
|
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Punjab Land Records Authority |
Lahore |
2021 |
|
|
4 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data provided by regulatory authority. Lack of information on data methodology. |
Data not available in raw form and is available through an online portal |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Lahore |
Punjab Land Records AuthorityLink to source |
2021-08-04 |
2021 |
4 |
|
|
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Gul and Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants |
Peshawar |
2013 |
|
|
9 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
No website is associated with data source and findings are not confirmable |
Data is representative for Peshawar City |
Data collected more than 5 years ago. Data value may be outdated. |
Data is outdated and lacks information on data collection methodology. Source verifiability remains a concern. |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Peshawar |
Gul and Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants |
2021-10-11 |
2013 |
9 |
|
|
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Islamabad Capital Territory Administration (ICTA) |
Islamabad |
2021 |
|
|
7 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data provided by regulatory authority. Data is documented and well defined but it does not indicate when data was made available/updated. |
Data available on online webpage |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of procedures to register residential property |
Islamabad |
Islamabad Capital Territory Administration (ICTA)Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2021 |
7 |
|
|
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete
|
Provincial Land Authorities' and Revenue Departments |
National |
2021 |
|
|
Processing, executing and obtaining a sales certificate from the sub-registrars office |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Indicator definition is only available for cities in Punjab and Sindh. Data methodology is not indicated. Lack of information on underlying data sources. |
Data value acquired through portal which was difficult to access |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
National |
Provincial Land Authorities' and Revenue Departments |
2021-08-17 |
2021 |
Processing, executing and obtaining a sales certificate from the sub-registrars office |
|
|
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Partners |
Partners |
2021 |
|
|
Varies based on Province |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative and excludes key aggregations |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on few key experts |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Partners |
Partners |
2021-08-18 |
2021 |
Varies based on Province |
|
|
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Pakistan Doing Business |
Karachi |
2021 |
|
|
Obtaining a Sales Certificate |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Lack of information on methodology and underlying data sources |
Data not available in raw form and is available through an online portal |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Karachi |
Pakistan Doing BusinessLink to source |
2021-08-04 |
2021 |
Obtaining a Sales Certificate |
|
|
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Punjab Land Records Authority |
Lahore |
2021 |
|
|
Execution & Registration of a Deed Before Registration Authority & Mutation in Revenue Record at Sub Registrar Office |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data provided by regulatory authority. Lack of information on data methodology. |
Data not available in raw form and is available through an online portal |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Lahore |
Punjab Land Records AuthorityLink to source |
2021-08-04 |
2021 |
Execution & Registration of a Deed Before Registration Authority & Mutation in Revenue Record at Sub Registrar Office |
|
|
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Gul and Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants |
Peshawar |
2013 |
|
|
Execution & Registration of a Deed Before Registration Authority/ Excise & Taxation Department |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
No website is associated with data source and findings are not confirmable |
Data is representative for Peshawar City |
Data collected more than 5 years ago. Data value may be outdated. |
Data is outdated and lacks information on data collection methodology. Source verifiability remains a concern. |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Peshawar |
Gul and Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants |
2021-10-11 |
2013 |
Execution & Registration of a Deed Before Registration Authority/ Excise & Taxation Department |
|
|
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Islamabad Capital Territory Administration (ICTA) |
Islamabad |
2021 |
|
|
Processing of Submitted Documents at the Office of the Sub-Registrar |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data provided by regulatory authority. Data is documented and well defined but it does not indicate when data was made available/updated. |
Data available on online webpage |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Name of residential property registration procedure that takes the longest to complete |
Islamabad |
Islamabad Capital Territory Administration (ICTA)Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2021 |
Processing of Submitted Documents at the Office of the Sub-Registrar |
|
|
Time to register residential property (days)
|
Provincial Land Authorities' and Revenue Departments |
National |
2021 |
|
|
11 to 14 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Indicator definition is only available for cities in Punjab. Data methodology is not indicated. |
Data value acquired through portal which was difficult to access |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Time to register residential property (days) |
National |
Provincial Land Authorities' and Revenue Departments |
2021-08-17 |
2021 |
11 to 14 |
|
|
Time to register residential property (days) |
Partners |
Partners |
2021 |
|
|
105 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative and excludes key aggregations |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on few key experts |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Time to register residential property (days) |
Partners |
Partners |
2021-09-01 |
2021 |
30 to 180 |
|
|
Time to register residential property (days) |
Pakistan Doing Business |
Karachi |
2021 |
|
|
14 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Lack of information on methodology and underlying data sources |
Data not available in raw form and is available through an online portal |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Time to register residential property (days) |
Karachi |
Pakistan Doing BusinessLink to source |
2021-08-11 |
2021 |
14 |
|
|
Time to register residential property (days) |
Punjab Land Records Authority |
Lahore |
2021 |
|
|
11 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data provided by regulatory authority. Lack of information on data methodology. |
Data not available in raw form and is available through an online portal |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Time to register residential property (days) |
Lahore |
Punjab Land Records AuthorityLink to source |
2021-08-04 |
2021 |
11 |
|
|
Time to register residential property (days) |
Gul and Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants |
Peshawar |
2013 |
|
|
53 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
No website is associated with data source and findings are not confirmable |
Data is representative for Peshawar City |
Data collected more than 5 years ago. Data value may be outdated. |
Data is outdated and lacks information on data collection methodology. Source verifiability remains a concern. |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Time to register residential property (days) |
Peshawar |
Gul and Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants |
2021-10-11 |
2013 |
53 |
|
|
Cost to register residential property
|
Provincial Land Authorities' and Revenue Departments |
National |
2021 |
|
|
1% to 6% of property value |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Indicator definition is only available for cities in Punjab. Data methodology is not indicated. |
Data value acquired through portal which was difficult to access |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Cost to register residential property |
National |
Provincial Land Authorities' and Revenue Departments |
2021-08-17 |
2021 |
1% to 6% of property value |
|
|
Cost to register residential property |
Partners |
Partners |
2021 |
|
|
1% to 6% of property value |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Findings estimated with input from key experts but not confirmable |
Sample size is not fully representative and excludes key aggregations |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data lacks information on methodology and relies on few key experts |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Cost to register residential property |
Partners |
Partners |
2021-09-01 |
2021 |
1% to 6% of property value |
|
|
Cost to register residential property |
Pakistan Doing Business |
Karachi |
2021 |
|
|
PKR 342,058, plus 1-6% of property value |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Lack of information on methodology and underlying data sources |
Data not available in raw form and is available through an online portal |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Cost to register residential property |
Karachi |
Pakistan Doing BusinessLink to source |
2021-08-11 |
2021 |
PKR 342058, plus 1-6% of property value |
|
|
Cost to register residential property |
Punjab Land Records Authority |
Lahore |
2021 |
|
|
PKR 1,500 plus 6% property value (Town Fee: 1%, CVT: 2%, Stamp Duty: 3%) |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps. Data value has been counted by visiting data source. |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data provided by regulatory authority. Lack of information on data methodology. |
Data not available in raw form and is available through an online portal |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Cost to register residential property |
Lahore |
Punjab Land Records AuthorityLink to source |
2021-08-04 |
2021 |
PKR 1,500 plus 6% property value (Town Fee: 1%, CVT: 2%, Stamp Duty: 3%) |
|
|
Cost to register residential property |
Gul and Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants |
Peshawar |
2013 |
|
|
Up to PKR 10,880 plus 5.5% property value (Stamp Duty: 3%, Transfer Tax: 2%, Registration fees: 0.5%) |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
No information available on methodology |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
No website is associated with data source and findings are not confirmable |
Data is representative for Peshawar City |
Data collected more than 5 years ago. Data value may be outdated. |
Data is outdated and lacks information on data collection methodology. Source verifiability remains a concern. |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Cost to register residential property |
Peshawar |
Gul and Haider Advocates and Legal Consultants |
2021-10-11 |
2013 |
Up to PKR 10,880 plus 5.5% property value (Stamp Duty: 3%, Transfer Tax: 2%, Registration fees: 0.5%) |
|
|
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Asia
|
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
National |
2020 |
|
|
11 out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Asia |
National |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-05 |
2020 |
Ranked 11th out of 48 countries and cities |
|
|
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Asia |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Karachi |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 16 with 5 other countries out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Asia |
Karachi |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 16th with 5 other countries and cities out of 48 |
|
|
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Asia |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Lahore |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 2 with 1 other country out of 48 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Asia |
Lahore |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 2nd with 1 other country and city out of 48 |
|
|
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Global
|
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
National |
2020 |
|
|
38 out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Global |
National |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-05 |
2020 |
Ranked 38th out of 190 countries and cities |
|
|
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Global |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Karachi |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 59 with 21 other countries out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Global |
Karachi |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 59th with 21 other countries and cities out of 190 |
|
|
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Global |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator |
Lahore |
2020 |
|
|
Tied 8 with 3 other countries out of 190 |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data irregularities have been reported pertaining to Doing Business Report. Report has been discontinued. |
Data is available for required aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
No indication of when data will be updated. Data methodology not entirely reliable. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
World Bank DBI transparency of information index ranking: Global |
Lahore |
World Bank Doing Business Indicator Link to source |
2021-08-11 |
2020 |
Tied 8th with 3 other countries and cities out of 190 |
|
|
% Of residential development projects where developers are paying for bulk infrastructure or the building of roads
|
Partners |
Partners |
2021 |
|
|
100% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Methodology is documented but with many gaps |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Indicator source aligns with indicator requirement and aggregation |
Sample size is fully representative for the required aggregate |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data methodology and verifiability remains unavailable |
Data value acquired in person/ specific request |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of residential development projects where developers are providing bulk infrastructure or building roads |
Partners |
AMC & Modulus Tech |
2021-10-11 |
2021 |
7 |
Number of residential development projects across developers |
Partners |
AMC & Modulus Tech |
2021-07-16 |
2021 |
7 |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved drinking water services
|
The DHS Program |
National |
2018 |
|
|
5% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data is calculated by a reputable source and aligns with data from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics |
DHS data is not available for city level aggregations and sample size is small |
Data collected and published within the last 5 years |
Data difficult to access. Data code not available for download. Existing data obtained from tables and reports. |
Data is difficult to find. Complicated calculations are required. |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of households without access to improved drinking water services |
National |
The DHS Program, Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-16 |
2017 |
1,609,280 |
Number of households |
National |
Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-11 |
2017 |
32,185,605 |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM) |
Urban |
2019 |
|
|
1.31% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is well defined. Measurement in line with definition. Data provided by regulatory authority. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Urban |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM), Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-09-26 |
2017 |
159,869 |
Number of households |
Urban |
Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-11 |
2017 |
12,203,750 |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved drinking water services |
The DHS Program |
Bottom 40 |
2018 |
|
|
8.32% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data is calculated by a reputable source and aligns with data from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics |
DHS data is not available for city level aggregations and sample size is small |
Data collected and published within the last 5 years |
Data format difficult to access |
Data is difficult to find. Complicated calculations are required. |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM) |
Karachi |
2019 |
|
|
1.45% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is well defined. Measurement in line with definition. Data provided by regulatory authority. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Karachi |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM), Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-23 |
2017 |
39,590 |
Number of households |
Karachi |
Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-23 |
2017 |
2,730,368 |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM) |
Lahore |
2019 |
|
|
0.40% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is well defined. Measurement in line with definition. Data provided by regulatory authority. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Lahore |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM), Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-24 |
2017 |
6,979 |
Number of households |
Lahore |
Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-23 |
2017 |
1,744,755 |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM) |
Peshawar |
2019 |
|
|
5.86% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is well defined. Measurement in line with definition. Data provided by regulatory authority. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Peshawar |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM), Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-25 |
2017 |
28,842 |
Number of households |
Peshawar |
Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-23 |
2017 |
492,194 |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM) |
Quetta |
2019 |
|
|
0.20% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is well defined. Measurement in line with definition. Data provided by regulatory authority. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Quetta |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM), Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-26 |
2017 |
542 |
Number of households |
Quetta |
Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-23 |
2017 |
271,328 |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM) |
Islamabad |
2019 |
|
|
1.33% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Narrative |
Data is documented and well defined |
Indicator fully in line with definition |
Data source is a government authority/ government regulated institution |
Data value is available for majority of the aggregation(s) |
Data collected in the previous 2 calendar years |
Data is well defined. Measurement in line with definition. Data provided by regulatory authority. |
Raw data is available online and requires no manipulation |
Data Elements
|
Aggregation |
Source |
Collection Date |
Year |
Value |
Number of households without access to improved drinking water services |
Islamabad |
Pakistan Social and Living Standard Measurement (PSLM), Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-27 |
2017 |
4,417 |
Number of households |
Islamabad |
Population and Housing CensusLink to source |
2021-08-11 |
2017 |
332,145 |
|
|
% Of households without access to improved sanitation services
|
The DHS Program |
National |
2018 |
|
|
31% |
Indicator Quality Assessment
|
Verifiable |
Relevant |
Credible |
Representative |
Timely |
Final Score |
Data Accessibility |
Quality Score |
|
|
|
|
| |